ENDE

Evidence atlas

Technical Evidence Atlas

A figure-based technical atlas that turns the report material into concise evidence cards: image, interpretation, source, document reference and direct links into the deep-zoom viewer or comparison lab.

Evidence points
12
Categories
5
Basis
Technical report
Fig. 62. Detail of eyes, privately owned version.
SupportsFig. 62. Detail of eyes, privately owned version.

Eyes: private version detail

Eye details are useful for comparing execution quality, gaze construction and local corrections between the Vienna and Prado versions.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; comparative figures
Document
Technical report / comparison set
Page / figure
fig. 62
Open in viewerOpen comparison
Fig. 73. Detail of earring, privately owned version (left)
SupportsFig. 73. Detail of earring, privately owned version (left)

Pearl earring

The earring detail belongs to the group of jewellery comparison points relevant to variant handling and local finish.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; comparative figures
Document
Technical report / comparison set
Page / figure
fig. 73
Open in viewer
Fig. 26a. Change in the position of the pearl necklace
SupportsFig. 26a. Change in the position of the pearl necklace

Pearl necklace repositioning

Reported change in the necklace position is an important pentimento-type observation, supporting a creative variant model rather than a purely mechanical copy.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; Chrościcki / Krzyżagórska-Pisarek summary
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
figs. 26a-c; summary p. 21
Open in viewerOpen comparison
Fig. 68. Detail of dress and lace, privately owned version
ContextFig. 68. Detail of dress and lace, privately owned version

Dress and lace

The lace and dress details allow close comparison of ornamental handling, rhythm and degree of finish.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; comparative figures
Document
Technical report / comparison set
Page / figure
fig. 68
Open in viewerOpen comparison
Fig. 65. Detail of hand, privately owned version
SupportsFig. 65. Detail of hand, privately owned version

Hand detail

The hand is a key comparison zone because small changes in fingers and contour are discussed in technical and infrared evidence.

Source
KIK-IRPA report
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
figs. 22a-c, 24a-b, 65
Open in viewerOpen comparison
Fig. 29. Detail of the sketchily painted caryatids in the background
ContextFig. 29. Detail of the sketchily painted caryatids in the background

Architectural background

Background and caryatid details are relevant to workshop division, finish hierarchy and comparison with related architectural settings.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; conference architectural setting segment
Document
Technical report / conference record
Page / figure
figs. 29, 75-76; timeline 56:47
Open in viewerOpen comparison
Fig. 02. The structure of the stretcher is visible in the X-radiograph
CautionFig. 02. The structure of the stretcher is visible in the X-radiograph

Stretcher visible in X-radiograph

The stretcher is later than the seventeenth century, so the atlas separates support history from evidence belonging to the original painting structure.

Source
KIK-IRPA report
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
pp. 7-11; figs. 1-4
Open in viewer
Fig. 56. X-radiograph, privately-owned version
SupportsFig. 56. X-radiograph, privately-owned version

X-radiograph: private version

The X-radiograph is central for structural reading, changes below the surface and comparison with the Prado technical image set.

Source
KIK-IRPA report; comparative figures
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
fig. 56
Open in viewer
Fig. 39. Infrared photograph
SupportsFig. 39. Infrared photograph

Infrared evidence

Infrared imagery is used for reading underdrawing-like evidence, contour corrections and local changes in hand and costume details.

Source
KIK-IRPA report
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
figs. 21, 24, 39, 78
Open in viewer
Fig. 37. Painting in UV light
ContextFig. 37. Painting in UV light

UV fluorescence

UV images clarify restoration, retouching, cleaning tests and surface condition, which prevents conservation history from being confused with original handling.

Source
KIK-IRPA report
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
figs. 37, 90, 93, 97, 102
Open in viewer
Fig. 101. Painting after cleaning and filling
ContextFig. 101. Painting after cleaning and filling

Condition after treatment

Before/after treatment images anchor the technical evidence in conservation reality and document what belongs to later intervention.

Source
KIK-IRPA conservation documentation
Document
Technical report
Page / figure
figs. 101-111
Open in viewer